Syed Shahabuddin
Home  |  About  |  Introduction  Achives  |  Ideas & Comments  |  Documents  |  Today's EventsContact Us
 
 
Syed Shahabuddin is a well known in the political and academic circles as well as in the mass media and does not need an introduction.
In his many incarnations he has been a university teacher, a diplomat, who served as an ambassador and a government official who was at the time of his seeking pre-mature retirement, the Joint Secretary in charge of South East Asia, the Indian Ocean and the Pacific in the Ministry of External Affairs. He was a MP for three terms between 1979 and 1996 and made a mark as a Parliamentarian. He has edited Muslim India, the monthly journal of research, documentation and reference from 1983 to 2002 and again from July 2006. He has been a regular contributor on current affairs in the media and a familiar participant in seminars and TV discussions. He has been a member of many learned bodies and associated with several Muslim institutions and organizations. More...
Email info@syedshahabuddin.com
Tel: +91 11 26914558
Fax: +91 11 268979965
   
  Communalism/ Revivalism
 
  Constitution/Law
 
  Communal /Caste Violence
 
  Democracy/National Politics
 
  Education & Culture/Urdu
 
  Elections
 
  Empowerment
 
  Executive / Governance
 
  Freedom Movement/ Partition
 
  History
 
  Haj
 
  Human/Minorities Rights
 
  Infiltration
 
  Islam
 
  Judiciary
 
  Kashmir Situation
 
  Mass Media
 
  Muslim Politics
 
  Muslim World
 
  Nationalism/Hindu Chauvinism
 
  Personal Law
 
  Secularism/ Religious Rights
 
  Social Justice/Reservation
 
  Sachar & Mishra Reports
 
  States
 
  Terrorism/Hindu/Muslim/State
 
  Wakf/ Madrasa/ Masjid
 
   
 

 

Possible Holes in the Report
The Liberhan Report is not likely to answer all our questions about the sequence of events. The role of Narasimha Rao who no doubt had advance knowledge of the impending tragedy and of the real intention of the Sangh Parivar, the attitude of the state government of which he complained, he did not dismiss it & impose the President Rule, before the D-Day, though the papers were ready by 15 November..
Secondly, we may not know where the Kar Sevaks came from as Shiva Sena leader Thackeray claims credit for the Demolition. We may not know the reasons why Vajpayee was not summoned and examined by the Commission when it was known that he came to Lucknow to attend a public meeting on 5 December 1992. There are many such questions and we hope that the Liberhan Report will throw light on them so that we can see the political game going on. One wishes that the Commission had summoned the then Home Secretary and other Union Ministers particularly the junior Ministers who were close to Narasimha Rao. A great mystery lies in why not a finger was raised for 6 hours when the Babri Masjid was under demolition in broad day-light and not a shot was fired by the State Police and the Central Paramilitary Forces and why even after the real intent had become crystal clear by noon the centre did not take over the state or make any attempt to disperse the mob, even by a show-of force from the air through aircrafts and helicopters flying low over it. Why did the Supreme Court fail to see the dark clouds gathered on the horizon? Why did it remain a silent spectator on 6 December? One doubts whether all these dark corners have been looked into by Justice Liberhan. All we can say now that he has been unduly soft towards Advani, who had told the Commission and repeated it on many occasion that 6 December was the saddest day of his life. Surely he did not lack experience or intelligence to foresee the consequences of his nationwide mobilization through innovative means. On way to Ayodhya, he had clearly indicated that the Kar Sevaks were not going to Ayodhaya for Kirtan & Bhajan & that Kar Seva can be performed with shovels & spades.
My conclusion is that the main players, Narasimha Rao, Advani & Kalyan Singh had a common purpose and they achieved it. How can they absolve themselves before the bar of History and before the Nation?
It is felt that both the protectors and the demolishers had a common interest to demolish the Babari Masjid and wipe the slate clean for the Sangh Parivar to write on.