Dear Shri Bhardwaj,
On 9 March, 2009, the Outlook has published an article on the arrears in each High Court, which shows the total at 4 million! It has also worked out the number of years each High Court shall take to deal with its arrears, on the basis of five minutes for each case which you will agree is really unrealistic. Moreover, it is not clear whether the writer has taken into account the number of judges in each High Court.
In the body of the report you have been quoted to say that the government has approved 150 additional posts of High Court Judges. However, the level of vacancy is very high in many High Courts. For example, it stands at 14 out of 60 in Madras and 12 out of 18 in Chhatisgarh. It is obvious that the appointment of judges takes a long time. But this is a separate issue. The procedure of selection and appointment can be simplified.
I am writing this, however, to request you to clarify how location of a H.C. the size of a High Court bench are decided.
In the same article, Mr. Soli Sorabjee, the eminent advocate has suggested the appointment of senior advocates as ‘temporary judges’, in High Courts with which they are not connected. Even this will require the adoption of an output criteria per judge. In the meantime the level of arrears has been rising from year to year and assuming the proportion of a national debacle.
A radical change in the basic system both with regard to location of High Courts and fixing the strength of the bench and the procedure of appointment is called for. Tinkering with situation and procedure and adjudication outside High Court will not be of much help.
I would like only to point that the judiciary cannot be left to appoint itself. From this point of view, the establishment of the Indian Judicial Service which will provide at least 1/3, if not 1/2 of the judges of the High Courts, and the institution of a competitive examination for practising advocates with at least 10 years experience to provide the balance, while creating some space for legal experts and academician are urgently needed. Also the Executive should have an equal role with the judiciary in the selection and the appointment of S.C. and H.C. judges should be subject to confirmation by the parliament.
With kind regards |